Topics Topics Help/Instructions Help Edit Profile Profile Member List Register  
Search Last 1 | 3 | 7 Days Search Search Tree View Tree View  

Rate this post by selecting a number. 1 is the worst and 5 is the best.

    (Worst)    1    2    3    4    5     (Best)

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Charles Hull
New member
Username: Dabear

Post Number: 1
Registered: 08-2005
Posted From:

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0

Posted on Monday, August 22, 2005 - 02:11 pm:   

I am looking at these three AATVs and trying to determine the pro's/cons of each in order to make a decision on which to go with. I will be using for duck hunting in rice fields, crossing sloughs etc and always carry a lot of folks/gear. With the vangard II and the Max IV I'll have to pull a trailer for all the gear while the Response won't have to. The max IV has 26" tires while the argo's have 22" tires. All of the tec q&a sections focus on the Max and not Argo so my assumption going in is that the argo drive train is much more bullet proof (stronger frame, solid axle and no mx tranny). However the true 6x6 ability of the max and extra ground clearance would lead to better offroad ability. So, can the argo cut it in the rice fields/sloughs/swamps and is the mx that much worse on the Max? I eagerly await your replies!